Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Nappi v. Bennett Law PLLC
as 8:2014cv00270
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nappi
Defendant:
Bennett Law PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Curbelo Garcia et al v. Chapman Bennett et al
as 1:2013cv22210
Plaintiff:
Danilo Curbelo Garcia and Carlos Rafael Mena Perdomo
Defendant:
Alberto Chapman Bennett and Maria De La Caridad De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cox et al v. Randazza Legal Group et al
as 1:2013cv21924
Defendant:
Michael Whiteacre, Randazza Legal Group, Marc J. Randazza and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal L. Cox and 1-50 John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
COOK et al v. BENNETT et al
as 1:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
KIM COOK , BETHANN BROOKS , EMILY JEFFERIS and others
Defendant:
TONY BENNETT , GARY CHARTRAND , ADA G ARMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Manfred v. Bennett Law et al
as 0:2012cv61548
Plaintiff:
Frank Manfred, II
Defendant:
Bennett Law and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Manfred v. Bennett Law
as 0:2011cv62045
Defendant:
Bennett Law
Plaintiff:
Frank Manfred, II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Archie Bennett, Jr et al vs Nantucket Enterprises, Inc
as 9:2011mc80425
Plaintiff:
Archie Bennett, Jr. , Montgomery J. Bennett , David Kimichik and others
Defendant:
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Grocock
as 6:2009cv01833
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
J. Bennett Grocock
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
