Cases 41 - 50 of 86
SAUNDERS v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2018cv01438
Plaintiff:
NATHAN A. SAUNDERS
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER , AMANDA ALEXANDER, JANE SPENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OVERDEVEST NURSERIES, L.P. v. ACOSTA et al
as 1:2018cv01347
Plaintiff:
OVERDEVEST NURSERIES, L.P.
Defendant:
ALEXANDER ACOSTA, BRYAN JARRETT and ROSEMARY LAHASKY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
LUXEPRESS-II CORP. v. YANUKOVICH , et al.
as 1:2018cv00812
Defendant:
VIKTOR YANUKOVICH, MYKOLA AZAROV, ALEXEY AZAROV and others
Plaintiff:
MYKOLA IVANENKO, LARYSA IVANENKO, LUXEXPRESS 2016 CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
FRY v. KYLE et al
as 1:2018cv00698
Plaintiff:
JAMES NATHAN FRY
Defendant:
RICHARD KYLE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, COLLOTON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
KIM et al v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv02652
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, L. FRANCIS CISSNA and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER V. KIM , NELYA K. MIKHAYLOVA and DMITRY MIKHAYLOV
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
MEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE et al v. WRIGHT et al
as 1:2017cv02096
Plaintiff:
MEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE , NATASHA REIFENBERG and JANE DOE
Defendant:
DONALD J. WRIGHT , R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA and STEVEN T. MNUCHIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
AMDOCS, INC. v. ACOSTA
as 1:2017cv02084
Defendant:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Plaintiff:
AMDOCS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
CANUTO v. CARTER et al
as 1:2016mc02075
Plaintiff:
TERESITA A. CANUTO
Defendant:
ASH CARTER, RAY MABUS, PATRICK J. MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BALLARD v. ST. ELIZABETH HOSPITAL
as 1:2016cv01704
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER P.J. BALLARD
Defendant:
ST. ELIZABETH HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROADNAX et al v. ABRAMS et al
as 1:2016cv00664
Plaintiff:
KEITH RODERICK BROADNAX, RODNEY RYAN GRAVES and DAVID ALEXANDER MARTIN
Defendant:
IDA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
