Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Tradition Chile Agentes de Valores LTDA. et al v. ICAP Securities USA LLC. et al
as 1:2009cv10343
Plaintiff:
Tradition Chile Agentes de Valores LTDA., Tradition Chile Agentes de Valores LTDA., Tradition Chile Agentes de Valores LTDA. and others
Defendant:
ICAP Securities USA LLC., ICAP Capital Markets LLC., SIF ICAP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Flaherty v. Filardi, et al
as 1:2003cv02167
Plaintiff:
Marie Flaherty
Defendant:
Jason Filardi , George Tobia, Jr. , Burns and Levinson, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Doe v. 2-08-cv-5219-d1 et al
as 2:2008cv05219
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
2-08-cv-5219-d1, 2-08-cv-5219-d2 and 2-08-cv-5219-d3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02316
Plaintiff:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Defendant:
American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. and American Express Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2006md01775
Defendant:
One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3978, JSNP, INC v. ACE Aviation Holdings, INC, One or more Defendants in 06-cv-1503, Rosetti Handbags and Accessories, Ltd. v. Air France ADS et al, One or more Defendants in 06-cv-2157, Perlman v. British Airways PLC et al and others
Interested Party:
John Doe, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-2260, Antell v. British Airways PLC et al, One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-706 Fleurchem, Inc. v. British Airways et al, DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc.,11-cv-00564 and others
In Re:
Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation
Intervenor:
US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division
Not Classified By Court:
Brickman Concerts Inc. and I.O.D. Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In Re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2006md01738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Plaintiff(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Plaintiff(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453 and others
Defendant:
Defendant(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Defendant(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Defendant(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453 and others
Amicu:
Ministry of Commerce for the Peoples Republic of China and Ministry of Commerce for the Peoples Republic of China
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2005md01720
Interested Party:
Parkside Movies 14, Hampton Allied Pharmacy, Mon Ami Gabi Development LLC, DBA Mon Ami Gabi - Oakbrook and others
Not Classified By Court:
Keewatin Sinclair, Valentine Stores, Inc., Alsaker Corp/Broadway Truck Stops and others
Plaintiff:
Joe's Crab Shack - Abingdon MD, Inc., William-Sonoma Inc., Plaintiffs in Twisted Spoke v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al. 05-cv-5881 JG-JO and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Karla F. Solis, D.D.S., Inc. d/b/a LA Holistic Dentistry, Mr Gary Friedman and others
Defendant:
Defendants in civil action G.E.S. Bakery, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc,. et al. 05-cv-5879 JG-JO, Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants in civil action Performace Labs, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., et al 05-cv-5869 JG-JO and others
Amicus Curiae:
The European Commission, Canadian counsel for defendants in Canadian litigation received from and filed by hand by Canadian counsel, Amici Objecting States and others
Interpleader:
MNZ Inc
Respondent:
Visa Inc.
Intervenor:
Keila Ravelo and Mary Watson
3Rd Party Defendant:
Discover
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Oneota Community Food Co-op
Claimant:
St. Louis Airport Taxi, LLC.
In Re:
Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
