Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the 24th Civil Court of Santiago, Chile in Juan Carols Said Kattan v. Antonio Miguel Orlandini Said, et al.
as 1:2017mc22657
Plaintiff:
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the 24th Civil Court of Santiago, Chile in Juan Carols Said Kattan v. Antonio Miguel Orlandini Said, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Freedom Watch, Inc. v. Judicial Watch, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv22627
Plaintiff:
Freedom Watch, Inc.
Defendant:
Judicial Watch, Inc. and The American Conservative Union
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Court of First Instance in Civil and Commercial Matters No. 14 in Buenos Aires, Argentina in Ramiro Eduardo Vasena v. Heirs Eduardo Humberto P. V
as 1:2017mc22507
Plaintiff:
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Court of First Instance in Civil and Commercial Matters No. 14 in Buenos Aires, Argentina in Ramiro Eduardo Vasena v. Heirs Eduardo Humberto P. V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Fifth Court of First Instance in Civil, Mercantile, Transit, and Banking Matters in Caracas, Venezuela in Alvaro Enrique Espinosa Barraga, et al.
as 1:2017mc22338
Plaintiff:
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Fifth Court of First Instance in Civil, Mercantile, Transit, and Banking Matters in Caracas, Venezuela in Alvaro Enrique Espinosa Barraga, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Sixth Family Court of the First Judicial District on Monterrey, Nuevo Leon in Mexico in Blanca Angelica Sada Perales v. Ricardo Gonzalez Gonzalez
as 1:2017mc21228
Plaintiff:
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Sixth Family Court of the First Judicial District on Monterrey, Nuevo Leon in Mexico in Blanca Angelica Sada Perales v. Ricardo Gonzalez Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
In Re: Request for International Judicial Assistance from the National Employment Court of First Instance No. 53 in Buenos Aires, Argentina in Charlie McDonald v. APR Energy LLC, et al Ref. No. 2188/2
as 3:2017mc00007
Plaintiff:
In Re: Request for International Judicial Assistance from the National Employment Court of First Instance No. 53 in Buenos Aires, Argentina in Charlie McDonald v. APR Energy LLC, et al
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the National Court of First Instance in Civil Matters No. 104 Buenos Aires in Inheritance Matters of Ignacio Rechanik
as 1:2016mc24646
Plaintiff:
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the National Court of First Instance in Civil Matters No. 104 Buenos Aires in Inheritance Matters of Ignacio Rechanik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the National Labor Court of First Instance No. 32 in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in Antonio Francisco Crespo v. Nokia Argentina S.A.
as 1:2016mc24526
Plaintiff:
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the National Labor Court of First Instance No. 32 in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in Antonio Francisco Crespo v. Nokia Argentina S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Court of Law County Dolj, Romania; in Nicolae v. Ioana
as 1:2016mc24446
Plaintiff:
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Court of Law County Dolj, Romania; in Nicolae v. Ioana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the National Court of the First Instance No. 6 of Buenos Aires, Argentina in the matter of Elisa Alicia Miceli v. Systems Link International
as 1:2016mc22959
Plaintiff:
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the National Court of the First Instance No. 6 of Buenos Aires, Argentina in the matter of Elisa Alicia Miceli v. Systems Link International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
