Cases 41 - 50 of 329
O'Dell v. Duke Realty Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06425
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Duke Realty Corporation, James B. Connor, David P. Stockert and others
Stein v. Duke Realty Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06387
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Duke Realty Corporation, James B. Connor, David P. Stockert and others
Riley v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06359
Plaintiff:
Sean Riley
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., G. Kelly Martin, Owen Hughes and others
Walton v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06171
Plaintiff:
James Walton
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Catherine J. Friedman, Jean-Pierre Garnier and others
Schnupp v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06117
Plaintiff:
Timothy Schnupp
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Catherine Friedman, Jean-Pierre Garnier and others
Wang v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06116
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, M.D., Catherine Friedman and others
White v. Kelly, Grossman & Kerrigan, LLP et al
as 1:2022cv04259
Plaintiff:
Shira White
Defendant:
Kelly, Grossman & Kerrigan, LLP and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hettiarachchige et al v. Bitter et al
as 1:2022cv03622
Plaintiff:
Anupama Deupathy Hettiarachchige, Keshani Rozaine Malmi D Liyanaralalage and Keshani Rozaine Malmi De Silva Liyanaralalage
Defendant:
Rena Bitter, Julie M. Stufft, Julie Chung and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Floyd's of Leadville, Inc. v. Alexander Capital LP et al
as 1:2022cv03318
Plaintiff:
Floyd's of Leadville, Inc.
Defendant:
Alexander Capital LP, NESA Management LLC, Joseph Anthony Amato and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Montoya v. Exterran Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01769
Plaintiff:
Kelli Montoya
Defendant:
Exterran Corporation, Mark R. Sotir, Andrew J. Way and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
