Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Lee v. EMI Resorts Inc., et al
as 1:2010cv22549
Defendant:
EMI Resorts Inc. , EMI Sun Village Inc. , Derek Elliott and others
Pecial_master:
Thomas E. Scott
Plaintiff:
May Lee
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Mais et al v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
as 0:2010cv60829
Plaintiff:
Laura K. Mais and Mark S. Mais
Defendant:
National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mais et al v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
as 0:2010cv60733
Plaintiff:
Laura K. Mais and Mark S. Mais
Defendant:
Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Securities & Exchange Commission et al v. May et al
as 6:2010mc00035
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Alan Todd May and Propser Energy, Inc.
Receiver:
Kelly M. Crawford
Securities & Exchange Commission et al v. May et al
as 6:2010mc00034
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Alan Todd May and Prosper Oil & Gas, Inc.
Receiver:
Kelly M. Crawford
Securities and Exchange Commission v. May et al
as 1:2010mc20752
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Alan Todd May, Prosper Oil & Gas, Inc. and Kelly M. Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MAY
as 4:2010mc00024
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ALAN TODD MAY
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MAY
as 4:2010mc00023
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ALAN TODD MAY and PROSPER OIL AND GAS INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv62050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mays v. Candela et al
as 1:2009cv21302
Plaintiff:
Morris J. Mays
Defendant:
William X. Candela, Julie Edwards, Christine M. King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
