Cases 41 - 50 of 69
ASHLEY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv00369
Plaintiff:
RICKY ASHLEY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, BRIAN S. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRETT v. WALTON et al
as 1:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
REGGIE WALTON, AUDREY CARTER, UNKNOWN BLACK US MARSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REEDOM v. VILSACK
as 1:2012cv02028
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL REEDOM, JR.
Defendant:
TOM VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HONEY v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2012cv01992
Plaintiff:
VICTOR CARL HONEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
KELLY v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2012cv01779
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT KELLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
STEWART et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01654
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
SHAVON STEWART , A. D. , GEROLEAN CURETON and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
PROPHET et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00724
Plaintiff:
SANDRA PROPHET , C. P. , LANITA LOGAN and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
MCCALL v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012mc00260
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LEE MCCALL
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, SCOTT BOWLIN and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
QUEZADA v. MARSHALL et al
as 1:2012cv00518
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. QUEZADA
Defendant:
SUE MARSHALL , VINCENT C. GRAY , KWAME R. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIELS v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2012cv00485
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL C. DANIELS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
