Cases 51 - 60 of 102
Ross v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 6:2016cv00668
Plaintiff:
Verna Ross
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Thelwell v. Beltline Road Insurance Agency Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv20942
Plaintiff:
April Thelwell
Defendant:
Beltline Road Insurance Agency Inc., David M. Friedman, Homeward Residential, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Lowinger v. Erbey et al
as 0:2015cv62628
Plaintiff:
Robert Lowinger
Defendant:
William C. Erbey , Ronald M. Faris , Ronald J. Korn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Hutt v. Erbey et al
as 9:2015cv81709
Plaintiff:
Helene Hutt
Defendant:
William C. Erbey , Ronald M. Faris , Ronald J. Korn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Parker et al v. AHMSI Insurance Agency Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv23840
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Parker and Sandra Parker
Defendant:
AHMSI Insurance Agency Inc., Homeward Residential Holdings Inc., QBE Financial Institution Risk Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carkenord v. J. Ross Publishing, Inc.
as 0:2015cv60765
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Carkenord
Defendant:
J. Ross Publishing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hutt v. Erbey et al
as 9:2015cv80392
Plaintiff:
Helene Hutt
Defendant:
William C. Erbey, Ronald M. Faris, Ronald J. Korn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Bishop v. Ross Earle & Bonan, P.A. et al
as 2:2015cv14051
Plaintiff:
Connie Bishop
Defendant:
Ross Earle & Bonan, P.A. and Jacob E Ensor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Domond et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2014cv80399
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner:
Marie Nadege Domond , Clara Ricaurte , Robert Kevin Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
