Cases 51 - 60 of 133
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Palm House Hotel, LLLP et al
as 9:2018cv81038
Defendant:
Palm House Hotel, LLLP, Robert V. Matthews, United States Regional Economic Development Authority LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Duffey v. Bright House Networks, LLC
as 8:2018cv00388
Plaintiff:
Randall Duffey
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Washington v. Bright House Networks, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv00301
Plaintiff:
Aresha Washington
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROBERTS et al v. FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al
as 4:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAT ROBERTS and MAT MEDIA LLC
Defendant:
FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and RICHARD CORCORAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Asset Campus Housing, Inc.
as 0:2017cv62451
Plaintiff:
Sandra Garcia
Defendant:
Asset Campus Housing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Korda v. Bright House Networks, LLC
as 8:2017cv02227
Plaintiff:
Walt Korda
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Potter v. Florida Bar Association et al
as 9:2017cv80865
Defendant:
State Attorney Peter Antonacci, John Doe 1-500, Magistrate Joy B Scherer and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Potter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Lapinski et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 6:2017cv00883
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lapinski and James Lapinski
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Housing Finance Agency, D.R. Horton, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
