Other Statutes Cases filed in New York
Cases 51 - 60 of 310
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Coney Island Cigars, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05547
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Coney Island Cigars, Inc. doing business as Conquistador Cigar Parlor and Gennady Treyvus
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Necessary Studios, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05551
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Necessary Studios, Inc. doing business as Necessary Studios and LaVarro Jones
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv04530
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rittenhouse v. Lydall Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07064
Plaintiff: Joe Rittenhouse
Defendant: Lydall Inc., Marc T. Giles, Sara A. Greenstein and others
Wang v. PPD, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05234
Defendant: Colin Hill, Joe Bress, Allen Thorpe and others
Plaintiff: Elaine Wang
Bowles v. PPD, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04874
Plaintiff: Charles Bowles
Defendant: Colin Hill, Joe Bress, Allen Thorpe and others
Carlisle v. FBL Financial Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03319
Defendant: Scott E. VanderWal, Daniel D. Pitcher, Bryan L. Searle and others
Plaintiff: Sam Carlisle
Daniels v. PPD, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv04784
Defendant: Allen R. Thorpe, Colin Hill, Joe Bress and others
Plaintiff: Michael Daniels
Taylor v. FBL Financial Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03260
Defendant: Scott E. VanderWal, Daniel D. Pitcher, Bryan L. Searle and others
Plaintiff: Christopher Taylor
Ciccotelli v. FBL Financial Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03363
Defendant: Scott E. VanderWal, Daniel D. Pitcher, Bryan L. Searle and others
Plaintiff: Alex Ciccotelli

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?