Cases 51 - 60 of 80
Ray v. P&B Capital Group, LLC
as 1:2015cv01504
Plaintiff:
Ida Ray
Defendant:
P&B Capital Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Manwarren v. CMI Group, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00994
Plaintiff:
Ray Manwarren
Defendant:
The CMI Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rocha et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv08666
Plaintiff:
Carlos G Rocha and Arize 11, Inc
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. , Daniel J. Sullivan, Rodger G. Marticke and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Padilla v. DISH Network L.L.C.
as 1:2012cv07350
Defendant:
DISH Network L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Ray Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galbraith v. Lime Energy Co., Inc et al
as 1:2012cv06465
Plaintiff:
Ray Galbraith
Defendant:
Lime Energy Co., Inc , John O'Rourke , Jeffrey Mistarz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LKAL, LLC et al v. Master Vision Group USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01603
Plaintiff:
LKAL, LLC and Brent Meder
Defendant:
Master Vision Group USA, Inc., Ray Campo, Sovren Management, LLC and others
Respondent:
Bank of America Corp.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
LKAL, LLC et al v. Master Vision Group USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01602
Plaintiff:
LKAL, LLC and Brent Mender
Defendant:
Master Vision Group USA, Inc., Ray Campo, Sovren Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Manwarren v. United Revenue Corp.
as 3:2011cv00963
Plaintiff:
Ray Manwarren
Defendant:
United Revenue Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lim v. Government Of Singapore et al
as 3:2011cv50172
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Government Of Singapore, Lee Hsien Loong, Goh Chok Tong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. Charles Ray
as 1:2011cv01383
Defendant:
Charles Ray
Plaintiff:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
