Cases 51 - 60 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Patterson v. Adams et al
as 1:2017cv01078
Plaintiff:
Wayne Patterson
Defendant:
Carol Adams, James Dimas, Michelle Saddler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union-Industry Pension Fund and its Trustees et al v. Norrenberns Foods Inc et al
as 3:2017mc00004
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union-Industry Pension Fund and its Trustees , Industry Pension Fund and its Trustees , Anthony M. Perrone and others
Defendant:
Norrenberns Foods Inc and St. Christopher Villas, L.L.C.
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2016cv08211
Plaintiff:
Sharon Rogers
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie Products LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Lullo v. Rogers Auto Group, Inc
as 1:2016cv06495
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lullo
Defendant:
Rogers Auto Group, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Johnson v. K & B Financial, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson
Defendant:
K & B Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv09743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Carpenters' District Council of Greater St. Louis and Vicinity v. RJ3A, LLC et al
as 3:2015mc00073
Plaintiff:
Carpenters' District Council of Greater St. Louis and Vicinity
Defendant:
RJ3A, LLC, Roger A Strong and John J Pawloski
Rogers v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv04989
Plaintiff:
John E. Rogers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Rogers-McClain v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
as 1:2015cv04996
Plaintiff:
Ambrosia Rogers-McClain
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
