Cases 51 - 60 of 75
Walker v. Asset Acceptance, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv07859
Plaintiff:
Mona Walker
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC and Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lim v. Walker et al
as 1:2012cv06925
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Scott Walker, John J. McAlary, Diane F. Bosse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05937
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2012cv05389
Plaintiff:
Sheila Walker
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Walker v. Hodges
as 1:2011cv06810
Plaintiff:
Bettina Walker
Defendant:
Sylvia Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
In Re: Zimmer Nexgen Knee Implant Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2011cv05468
Defendant:
Wilson/Phillips Holdings, Inc., Joyce C. Litsey, Zimmer Melia Associates, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Scott, Relda Georgann Frietchen, Beverly Mulson and others
Not Yet Classified:
Peter Schosheim, Physicians Medical Review LLC and Geoffrey Schosheim
Petitioner:
Raquel Lao
In Re:
Zimmer Nexgen Knee Implant Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Walker v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 1:2011cv05278
Plaintiff:
Jordan Walker
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Walker v. Walker
as 1:2011cv02967
Petitioner:
Ian Walker
Respondent:
Norene Ann Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
