Cases 61 - 70 of 90
Morris, Jr. v. Digital Risk, LLC et al
as 0:2013cv61812
Defendant:
Digital Risk, LLC, Digital Risk Mortgage Services, LLC, Digital Risk Valuation Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Morris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
In re: State Attorney, 20th Judicial Circuit Court
as 2:2013mc00043
Petitioner:
Cleveland Morris
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Mandresh et al v. Coren
as 6:2013cv00995
Plaintiff:
Pamela Mandresh and Diane Morris
Defendant:
Howard Coren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SEAL v. SFPC HOLDING COMPANY LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00291
Plaintiff:
LARRY MORRIS SEAL
Defendant:
SFPC HOLDING COMPANY LLC, SOUTHERN FIDELITY RISK MANAGERS LLC and JAMES A GRAGANELLA
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. BRUDNICKI et al
as 5:2012cv00398
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
GREG M BRUDNICKI, JOSEPH F CHAPMAN, III, HENRY CLAYTON FUTRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Seraphin et al v. Morris Publishing, LLC
as 3:2012mc00031
Appellant:
Judith Seraphin and Ed Slavin
Appellee:
Morris Publishing, LLC
Morris v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Morris
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc. , Equifax Inc. and Professional Adjustment Corporation of Southwest Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Scottrade, Inc. v. Zucker et al
as 0:2011cv60235
Plaintiff:
Scottrade, Inc.
Defendant:
Benjamin Zucker and Morris Zucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS EARNEST v. NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS INC
as 3:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
MORRIS EARNEST
Defendant:
NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
