Cases 61 - 68 of 68
State of Utah v. Actvis US et al
as 2:2007cv00870
Plaintiff:
State of Utah and State of Utah
Defendant:
Actvis US, Barr Laboratories, Endo Pharmaceuticals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
United States of America et al v. Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation
as 2:2007cv00485
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Utah
Defendant:
Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Karls v. State of Utah
as 2:2007cv00445
Plaintiff:
John S. Karls
Defendant:
State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of Utah v. Eli Lilly & Co
as 2:2007cv00380
Plaintiff:
State of Utah and State of Utah
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Co and Eli Lilly & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
St UT v. Oldcastle, et al
as 2:2002cv00516
Plaintiff:
State of Utah
Defendant:
Oldcastle and Oldcastle Materials
Petitioner:
R. Joseph Clancy and Kilgore Pavement
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025 Clayton Act
ST UT v. Nucor Corp, et al
as 2:2001cv00106
Plaintiff:
State of Utah
Defendant:
Nucor Corp, GS Industries doing business as GST Steel and Moly Copy Chile
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025 Clayton Act
Kennecott UT v. Nucor Corp, et al
as 2:2001cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kennecott Utah Copper
Consolidated Plaintiff:
State of Utah
Defendant:
Nucor Corporation, GS Industries a Delaware corporation doing business as GST Steel and Moly-Cop Chile S.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025 Clayton Act
Pelt, et al v. UT
as 2:1992cv00639
Plaintiff:
Jake C. Pelt , Dan Benally , Jim Benally and others
Defendant:
State of Utah
Intervenor_defendant:
State of Utah
Counter_claimant:
State of Utah
Counter_defendant:
Jake C. Pelt , Dan Benally , Jim Benally and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Wallace Saltclah , Harrison Johnson , Leo Manheimer and others
Mediator:
William C. Canby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
