Cases 61 - 70 of 109
BARRY v. MCALEENAN et al
as 1:2019cv03202
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, WILLIAM P. BARR and KEVIN K. MCALEENAN
Plaintiff:
SOULEYMANE BARRY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
HAMWI v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv03156
Defendant:
DONALD NEUFELD, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
YASER HAMWI and AMEERA CHALABI
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
JEMERIGBE v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv03167
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL JEMERIGBE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
FIELDS v. BARR
as 1:2019mc00177
Plaintiff:
JANICE FIELDS
Defendant:
WILLIAM BARR and WILLIAM P. BARR
ALAMEER v. MCALEENAN et al
as 1:2019cv03036
Defendant:
KENNETH CUCCINELLI, WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH MADSEN and others
Plaintiff:
SINAN ALAMEER
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
AL ASSAD v. CUCCINELLI et al
as 1:2019cv03053
Defendant:
KENNETH CUCCINELLI, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES and WILLIAM P. BARR
Plaintiff:
WASIM AL ASSAD
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
ISSA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv02972
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, DESHAWNA WILLIAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff:
RAFAT ISSA
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
NAGTELECOM LLC et al v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02968
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, WILLIAM BARR, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN and others
Plaintiff:
PAVEL NAGIBIN and NAGTELECOM LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MISCHLER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv02937
Defendant:
LEEANN VEATCH, KELLY KNIGHT CRAFT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
AMY MISCHLER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MEHERETE v. MCALEENAN et al
as 1:2019cv02932
Plaintiff:
LEUL MEHERETE
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, WILLIAM BIERMAN, WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
