Cases 61 - 70 of 10,035
Shelton v. American Business Services Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
James E. Shelton
Defendant:
American Business Services Inc. doing business as Funding 770 and Narin Charanvattanakit
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Save the Poudre v. Spellmon
as 1:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Save the Poudre
Respondent:
Scott A. Spellmon
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 - Judicial Review of Agency Action
Anderson v. USA Boxing, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00400
Petitioner:
Amir Anderson
Respondent:
USA Boxing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration
Marshall v. Kovo HealthTech Corporation
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Marshall and Jonathan Marshall
Defendant:
Kovo HealthTech Corporation
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration
Chang v. Outer Range, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00397
Petitioner:
Ryan Chang
Respondent:
Outer Range, Inc., Steven Lee Cleghorn and Emily Cleghorn
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
