Cases 71 - 80 of 20,705
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
KELLY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2024cv01540
Plaintiff:
JOHN Q. KELLY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
WELTY v. U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2024cv01547
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TODD WELTY
Defendant:
U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2024cv01537
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
MASON CAPITAL L.P. et al v. REPUBLIC OF KOREA
as 1:2024cv01551
Petitioner:
MASON CAPITAL L.P. and MASON MANAGEMENT LLC
Respondent:
REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
GANTI v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv01532
Plaintiff:
LAKSHMINARAYANA VE GANTI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR M. JADDOU and TERRI ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CHEN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01032
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDERSON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2024cv01067
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
as 1:2024cv01519
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
AL NAQEEB v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01524
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED KADHIM AL NAQEEB
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, DAVID BURGER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
