Cases 81 - 90 of 196
PAREDES v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07286
Plaintiff:
GINA PAREDES
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
LEMASTERS et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07282
Plaintiff:
ANGELICA LEMASTERS and CHARLES LEMASTERS
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
FREDERICK v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07280
Plaintiff:
RUTH FREDERICK
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
PATRICK v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07275
Plaintiff:
JOANNE PATRICK
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
KIEHL et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07287
Plaintiff:
BETH KIEHL and KARL KIEHL
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
FILGER et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07121
Plaintiff:
DIANA M. FILGER and TOMMY W. FILGER
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
MOFFETT v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07127
Plaintiff:
SUSANNE MOFFETT
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
CORMIER et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07120
Plaintiff:
JUDITH CORMIER and WILLIAM CORMIER
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
DIAZ v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07117
Plaintiff:
DELIA DIAZ
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
REARDON v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07118
Plaintiff:
ALICE REARDON
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
