Cases 81 - 90 of 110
Broughton-Irving et al v. Saphir et al
as 1:2009cv07979
Defendant:
John M Saphir, Ira S Nathan, Jerry C Brucer and others
Plaintiff:
Carrie Broughton-Irving, bernard nevel, etta nevel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wofford v. Sutton
as 3:2003cv00725
Plaintiff:
Stanley Wofford
Defendant:
Chaplain Sutton and Terri Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenters' District Council of Greater St. Louis and Vicinity et al v. C.R. Vernier, Inc.
as 3:2009mc00088
Plaintiff:
Carpenters' District Council of Greater St. Louis and Vicinity, Terry M. Nelson, John P. Mulligan and others
Defendant:
C.R. Vernier, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Case name not on file
as 1:2009cv05367
Movant:
Terry Clemans and Stan Smith
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Henry Mounson v Rakesha Chandra et al
as 3:2004cv00365
Plaintiff:
Henry Mounson
Defendant:
Rakesha Chandra , Cheryl Couch , Katherine Clover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
