Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Curran et al v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 1:2024cv01419
Plaintiff:
Michael Curran and Timothy Borland
Defendant:
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Compagnie Gnrale des tablissements Michelin SCA, Michelin North America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Zappia v. Myovant Sciences Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv08097
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zappia
Defendant:
Myovant Sciences Ltd., Myovant Sciences, Inc., Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. and others
Halberstam v. Myovant Sciences Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv10788
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Halberstam
Defendant:
Myovant Sciences Ltd., Terrie Curran, Mark Guinan and others
Schiffenbauer v. Myovant Sciences Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv10467
Plaintiff:
Martin Schiffenbauer
Defendant:
Myovant Sciences Ltd., Terrie Curran, Mark Guinan and others
Bohus v. Joshi et al
as 1:2022cv02203
Plaintiff:
Geza Bohus
Defendant:
Vyomesh I. Joshi, Todd A. Booth, Jeffrey A. Graves and others
Le v. Bottomline Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Chau Le
Defendant:
Bottomline Technologies, Inc., Joseph Mullen, Kenneth J. D'Amato and others
Justice v. Bottomline Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Justice, II
Defendant:
Bottomline Technologies, Inc., Joseph L. Mullen, Kenneth J. D'Amato and others
Stein v. Bottomline Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00481
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Bottomline Technologies, Inc., Joseph L. Mullen, Kenneth J. D'Amato and others
Nguyen v. Vyomesh et al
as 1:2021cv03389
Defendant:
Thomas W. Erickson, Vasant Padmanabhan, William D. Humes and others
Plaintiff:
Thang Duc Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Reddy et al v. Collins
as 1:2019cv07883
Defendant:
Peter S. Collins
Plaintiff:
William C. Reddy, David C. Curran and David A. Curran
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
