Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CHUNG v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv02478
Plaintiff:
YUNWOO CHUNG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES' IMMIGRANT INVESTORS PROGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WANG et al v. AMERICAN INSTITUTE IN TAIWAN
as 1:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
CHIH-CHUNG WANG, HSIU LING CHANG, TIEN HSIN WANG and others
Defendant:
THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE IN TAIWAN and AMERICAN INSTITUTE IN TAIWAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
BUTLER et al v. DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA
as 1:2020cv02514
Plaintiff:
YOUNG HWA CHUNG KIM, CHUN KOOK KIM and DANI BUTLER
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA and NORTH KOREA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
BAE et al v. DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA
as 1:2020cv02260
Plaintiff:
LYDIA YUJIN BAE, KENNETH JUNHO BAE, TERRI SUHYUN CHUNG and others
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
POBLETE v. HUILO
as 1:2017mc00158
Petitioner:
LUIS IVAN POBLETE
Respondent:
CHUNG HUILO
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
POBLETE v. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 1:2016cv01799
Plaintiff:
LUIS IVAN POBLETE
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE , MICHAEL L. RANKIN, JOHN M. MOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CHUNG v. BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC
as 1:2014cv01503
Defendant:
BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CHUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAHN WORLD COMPANY, LTD v. CHUNG
as 1:2009mc00201
Plaintiff:
DAHN WORLD COMPANY, LTD
Defendant:
EUN HEE CHUNG
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
DAHN WORLD COMPANY, LTD v. CHUNG
as 1:2009mc00202
Plaintiff:
DAHN WORLD COMPANY, LTD
Defendant:
EUN HEE CHUNG
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
