Cases 1 - 10 of 1,135
Rojas v. Debt Relief Advocates, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04776
Defendant:
Cordoba Legal Group PLLC, Law Office of Peter M. Daigle, P.C., The, Debt Relief Advocates, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ilboudo v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04683
Plaintiff:
Razangwende Jean Modeste Ilboudo
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bornstein et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04425
Plaintiff:
Galyna Bornstein and Jeffrey Bornstein
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PETROVIC v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04160
Plaintiff:
JELENA PETROVIC
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Patel et al v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2024cv04181
Plaintiff:
Sangeeta Y Patel and yogeshkumar k patel
Defendant:
District Director UR M JADDOU, Director Laura B. Zuchowski and Alejandro N Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
State of Illinois v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv03979
Plaintiff:
State of Illinois
Defendant:
Keyona M Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hamid v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03913
Plaintiff:
Huma Hamid
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, UR M JADDOU, Acting District Dir. Mark HANSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv03853
Plaintiff:
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP, Nicholas Angelides, Perry Browder and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
