Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Hawaiian Ranchos Road Maintenance Corporation et al v. Gilroy et al
as 1:2023cv00493
Petitioner:
Hawaiian Ranchos Road Maintenance Corporation, Roy Thornton, Marcella Lynn Thornton and others
Respondent:
William Michael Gilroy, Mathilda Noilani Mason, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Noa Kanealii Io Pono I Kelii Ua Mau v. Saito et al
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Noa Kanealii Io Pono I Kelii Ua Mau
Defendant:
Tyler C. Saito, Michael Soong, State of Hawaii and others
Aiwohi et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Nathan Earl Aiwohi, Toby Alamoana Keohokapu, Darlene K. Ebos and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. Windward Planning Commission, County of Hawaii et al
as 1:2020cv00297
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC a Delaware Limited Liability Company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
Windward Planning Commission, County of Hawaii, Thomas Raffipiy, County of Hawaii Planning Department and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Thomas v. Imperial Industrial Supply Company et al
as 1:2019cv00540
Respondent:
Anthony Bustos, Steven L. Feldman, Imperial Industrial Supply Company and others
Petitioner:
Quintina Marie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Transfer of Offender pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4100 et seq.
as 1:2018mc00291
Defendant:
Justin Edward Garagan, Felicia Samoana Lemusu, Arlene Catherine Rose and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Althouse v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al
as 1:2014mc00237
Plaintiff:
Thomas Althouse
Defendant:
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., Andy Wachowski, Lana Wachowski and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
