Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Doe, et al. v. Horne, et al.
as 24-4749
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOE, ROBERT ROE, KATE ROE and others
Defendant:
GREGORY SCHOOL, ARIZONA INTERSCHOLASTIC ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Movant:
MARK MARVIN, Proposed Inervenor
Petersen, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Tucson
as 24-4335
Petitioner:
WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representative
Real Party In Interest:
LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe, THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Doe, et al. v. Horne, et al.
as 23-3188
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
USA WOMEN OF ACTION, doing business as Arizona Women of Action, ANNA VAN HOEK, LISA FINK and others
Thomas Horne v. USDC-AZT
as 23-70111
Not Classified By Court:
In re: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe and others
Petitioner:
THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
