Cases 1 - 6 of 6
KAHIN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2021cv03110
Plaintiff:
ADNAN DALAL KAHIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. EMBASSY IN NAIROBI, KENYA, ANTONY BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
ALASAFAR et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2021cv02516
Plaintiff:
Souzan Adnan Alasafar, Bayan Wardan Kozalbash, Fadia Wardan Kozalbash and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ARLINGTON ASYLUM OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
MEESA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2021cv00391
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KENNETH CUCCINELLI and others
Plaintiff:
ADNAN MEESA
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
SAJID et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv02068
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, CHAD WOLF and others
Plaintiff:
HIBBA MANZOOR and MUHAMMAD ADNAN SAJID
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
ANARWALA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv03274
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN and others
Plaintiff:
ADNAN ANARWALA
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
EMERGENCY COALITION TO DEFEND EDUCATIONAL TRAVEL ("ECDET") et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 1:2006cv01215
Plaintiff:
EMERGENCY COALITION TO DEFEND EDUCATIONAL TRAVEL, EMERGENCY COALITION TO DEFEND EDUCATIONAL TRAVEL, WAYNE S. SMITH and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES TREASURY OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, HENRY M. PAULSON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
