Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ashe v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
John Ashe
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Park Plus, Inc. v. The Automated Parking Company, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv60587
Plaintiff:
Park Plus, Inc.
Defendant:
The Automated Parking Company, LLC and Ash Jenkins
Ashe et al v. Hargrave et al
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Michael W Ashe, L Ashe Sheri, Michael W. Ashe and others
Defendant:
Kevin Hargrave, Tiffany L Hargrave, Federal Trade Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Price v. Jordan
as 4:2022cv10033
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lamont Price
Defendant:
Ashely Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sallah v. Searock et al
as 9:2017cv80665
Plaintiff:
James D. Sallah
Defendant:
Barbara Searock, Patrick Murphy, David Bregio and others
Counter_claimant:
Kristal Joyner
Counter_defendant:
James D. Sallah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Singleton v. Maury Cobb Attorney At Law, LLC
as 1:2017cv21185
Plaintiff:
Ash-lynn Singleton
Defendant:
Maury Cobb Attorney At Law, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ashe v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2016cv00731
Plaintiff:
John Ashe
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Save Crystal River, Inc. v. Jewell et al
as 5:2015cv00491
Plaintiff:
Save Crystal River, Inc.
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Daniel M. Ashe, United States Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Save Crystal River, Inc. v. Jewel et al
as 5:2014cv00253
Plaintiff:
Save Crystal River, Inc.
Defendant:
Sally Jewel, Daniel M. Ashe, United States Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
