Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Waterman v. Cellular Biomedicine Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00405
Defendant:
Chun Kwok Alan Au, Gang Ji, Cellular Biomedicine Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Parshall v. Cellular Biomedicine Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00377
Plaintiff:
James Parshall
Defendant:
Chun Kwok Alan Au, Cellular Biomedicine Group, Inc., Steve (Wentao) Liu and others
Benson v. Cellular Biomedicine Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06257
Defendant:
Chun Kwok Alan Au, Gang Ji, Cellular Biomedicine Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Benson
Broyles v. Cellular Biomedicine Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10597
Defendant:
Chun Kwok Alan Au, Gang Ji, Cellular Biomedicine Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Broyles
Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Marcus et al
as 1:2018mc00145
Plaintiff:
State of Florida and Federal Trade Commission
Receiver:
Jonathan Perlman
Defendant:
Jeremy Lee Marcus, Craig Davis Smith, Yisbet Segrea and others
Cause Of Action: M 19-63 Receivers - Property in Other Districts
Dillard-Doss et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2017mc00817
In Re:
Alice Phillips Belmonte
Movant:
Sherri Lynn Dillard-Doss
Respondent:
Harold D. Jones and Grant Parker
Jones v. Dillard-Doss et al
as 2:2017mc00254
In Re:
Alice Phillips Belmonte
Appellee:
Sherri Lynn Dillard-Doss and Grant Parker
Appellant:
Harold D. Jones
96 Rockwell, LLC et al v. Jones
as 2:2016mc00842
Movant:
135 West 14th Street, LLC, 96 Rockwell, LLC and Gayle R. Hardy Thompson
In Re:
Alice Phillips Belmonte
Respondent:
Harold D. Jones
Elliott et al v. Belmonte et al
as 1:2012cv05908
Plaintiff:
E.J. Elliott , George Kassianides , John E. Elliott and others
Defendant:
Alice Phillips Belmonte , Esq. and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Zhang et al v. Schlatter et al
as 1:2012cv01793
Plaintiff:
Haining Zhang and China Venture Partners, Inc.
Defendant:
Gary H. Schlatter, Oralabs, Inc., Robert C. Gust and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
