Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cecil v. Miller and Steeno, P.C.
as 4:2017cv04160
Plaintiff:
Elisa Cecil
Defendant:
Miller and Steeno, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Crane et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv09011
Plaintiff:
Cecile A. Crane and John D. Crane
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and Governmental National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Estate of Cecile Stuart Johnson v. Coutch et al
as 1:2014cv02093
Petitioner:
Estate of Cecile Stuart Johnson
Respondent:
Keith Coutch and Casey Coutch
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Kruel et al
as 1:2011cv07448
Plaintiff:
Cecil E Kruel and Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gonzalez et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv04621
Plaintiff:
Corina Louise Gonzalez and Melissa Cecille Gonzalez
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. , Michael Aytes , Donald P. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gupta et al v. Goode et al
as 1:2010cv04521
Plaintiff:
Narendra Gupta , Geeta Gupta , NGG Enterprises Limited Partnership and others
Defendant:
Michael C. Goode, Morris S. Friedman, Sally Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Gonzalez et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2010cv01573
Plaintiff:
Corina Louise Gonzalez and Melissa Cecille Gonzalez
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas , Janet Napolitano , Ruth Dorochoff and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv03280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
