Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WHITTAKER v. COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY et al
as 1:2019cv00199
Defendant:
COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
DAVIDA WHITTAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
SUMNER v. FEDERAL CITY RECOVERY SERVICES
as 1:2012mc00427
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. SUMNER
Defendant:
FEDERAL CITY RECOVERY SERVICES
Petitioner:
COURT SERVICE AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: MS:NoticeR
WILLIAMS-BEY et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2011mc00681
Respondent:
LATASHA EGGLESTON WILLIAMS-BEY
Petitioner:
COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: MS:NoticeR
SOBIN v. STOKES et al
as 1:2011cv00436
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SOBIN
Defendant:
YOLANDA STOKES, STEPHANIE GRAY and COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2010cv01658
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. JONES, JR.
Defendant:
COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , DANIEL CARTER , GLADYS DORGETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEWIS v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2010cv00605
Plaintiff:
ERIC LEWIS
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, BUREAU OF PRISONS, D.C. SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
In Re SUBPOENA TO COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY
as 1:2008mc00587
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GENERAL COUNSEL, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY
as 1:2008mc00454
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
GENERAL COUNSEL, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
