Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MONTERRA MF, LLC et al v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2021cv02513
Plaintiff:
MONTERRA MF, LLC, ARMANDO CODINA, JAMES CARR and others
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Petitioner:
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC, et al v. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF COMMERCE
as 1:2016cv00723
Plaintiff:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC , DAVID ERTEL , BRIAN BOMSTEIN and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF COMMERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR v. STEPHENS et al
as 1:2015mc00131
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND E. CARR
Defendant:
WILLIAMS STEPHENS, CHARLES A. MOELAND, RICK PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: Complaint
FROST v. CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01460
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. FROST
Defendant:
CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA , JOHN H. GARVEY , VERYL V. MILES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAVES et al v. BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
as 1:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, SARAH SIMON-ARNOLD, ROGER ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. LISTENVISION STUDIOS et al
as 1:2012cv00833
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE JONES
Defendant:
LISTENVISION STUDIOS, JEREMY BEAVER, KEVIN CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. v. POYNTER INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA STUDIES et al
as 1:2009cv01226
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC.
Defendant:
POYNTER INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA STUDIES, TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY, CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
LOVE et al v. VENEMAN
as 1:2000cv02502
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY LOVE , LIND MARIE BARA-WEAVER , MARGARET ODOM and others
Defendant:
TOM J. VILSACK
Movant:
BARBARA E, ADAMS , CHRISTINE BRAYBOY ANDERSON , GLADYS SCOTT ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
