Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lewis et al
as 1:2023cv06438
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Joseph C. Lewis, Carolyn W. Carter, Patrick J. O'Connor and others
Wang v. VectivBio Holding AG et al
as 1:2023cv04833
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
VectivBio Holding AG, Thomas F. Woiwode, Ph.D., Paul R. Carter and others
O'Dell v. VectivBio Holding AG et al
as 1:2023cv04790
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
VectivBio Holding AG, Thomas F. Woiwode, Ph.D., Paul R. Carter and others
Bushansky v. VectivBio Holding AG et al
as 1:2023cv04745
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
VectivBio Holding AG, Thomas F. Woiwode, Paul R. Carter and others
Carter v. Sewell et al
as 1:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Carter and Darryl Chadwich Carter
Defendant:
Keechant L. Sewell, Kathy Hochul and Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Zeitouni v. Dorsey et al
as 1:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Neil Zeitouni
Defendant:
Jack Dorsey, Roelof Botha, Amy Brooks and others
Nominal Defendant:
Block, Inc.
Rubin v. Dorsey et al
as 1:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Defendant:
Jack Dorsey, Roelof Botha, Amy Brooks and others
Nominal Defendant:
Block, Inc.
Tsou v. Dorsey et al
as 1:2022cv10747
Plaintiff:
James Tsou
Defendant:
Jack Dorsey, Amrita Ahuja, Roelof Botha and others
Nominal Defendant:
Block, Inc.
Lead Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin and Neil Zeitouni
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Consolidated Defendant:
Shawn Carter
Carter v. Resolute Forest Products Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07466
Plaintiff:
James Carter
Defendant:
Resolute Forest Products Inc., Duncan K. Davies, Bradley P. Martin and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
