Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Williams v. Clark County et al
as 2:2019cv01212
Defendant:
(FNU) Phillips, Sgt Judd, Deputy DA Frank Logrippo and others
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Neven et al
as 3:2018cv00033
Defendant:
Mr. Baca, Loeman Church, Greg Cox and others
Unknown:
A Wayne Carter, Martin I. Melendrez, Robert Simon and others
702) 386-1946 (fax:
Raelene K. Palmer, Raelene K. Palmer, Raelene K. Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIGUEL RAMIREZ, ET AL. V. KENNY GUINN, ET AL.
as 3:2002cv00469
Plaintiff:
Rome Richard Chacon, Andres Medina, Armando Nevarez and others
Defendant:
Pat Conmay, Jackie Crawford, Adam Endel and others
Unknown:
Lilli C. Hitt, Lilli C. Hitt, Lilli C. Hitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RONALD DUDLEY V. D.W. NEVEN
as 3:1998cv00350
Defendant:
Bill Book, Tony Carlysle, Bill Donat and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dudley
Williams v. Clark County School District et al
as 2:2013cv00314
Defendant:
Clark County School District, Dwight D. Jones and Janice Rollins-Monteiro
Plaintiff:
Chablis Stewart Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Panliant Financial Corporation et al v. ISEE3D, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01376
Plaintiff:
A.G. Solutions, Limited, Panliant Financial Corporation and Alan G Smith
Defendant:
Bay Management Ltd., Mark Geohegan, ISEE3D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mitchell v. Neven
as 3:2010cv00349
Petitioner:
Deangelo Lamont Mitchell
Respondent:
Dwight Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv00667
Defendant:
AWO Baca, AWP Morrow, Dwight Neven and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Otis Sullivan
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
