Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Eppes v. MMM Consumer Brands, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06341
Plaintiff:
Danielle Eppes
Defendant:
MMM Consumer Brands, Inc. doing business as Marley Spoon
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Epps v. Pepsico Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv01389
Plaintiff:
Joshua Epps
Defendant:
Pepsico Inc. and Quail Mountain Coffee & Vending
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mellon et al v. Islamic Republic Of Iran
as 1:2019cv11767
Plaintiff:
Craig Centro, Harold Hughes, Rosemarie Maggiore and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic Of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. v. Duckworth et al
as 1:2016cv00410
Plaintiff:
Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Roger F. Duckworth, Nicholas Kinghorn, John Rudland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: IPO Securities Lit., et al v. , et al
as 1:2021mc00092
Plaintiff:
John Gulizia, Daniel Kucera, Paterson Family Trust and others
Petitioner:
Dale Scott, Robert E. Wallin, Shailesh Pathak and others
Defendant:
WebMethods, Inc., Lehman Brothers, Zhou Shun Ao and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Charles W. Wingfield, III and James W. Giddens
Lead Plaintiff:
Forrest England and Estelle Cohen
Appellant:
James J Hayes, Robert J Federmann, Dolly Bhatt and others
Not Classified By Court:
Richard Paul Warren, Ronald Ady, James J. Mary and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Diane C. Collins, James E. Collins, Frederick B. Henderson and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
United States of v. Epps
as 1:1997cv04117
Defendant:
James Epps
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Doom v. M. Richard Epps, P.C. et al
as 7:2013cv04808
Plaintiff:
Kim Doom
Defendant:
M. Richard Epps, P.C. and DS Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
