Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al v. SHINSEKI et al
as 1:2014cv00766
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and THOMAS M. GIARDINI
Defendant:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI , JAN R. FRYE and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA v. SHINSEKI
as 1:2013cv01762
Plaintiff:
CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BLUE WATER NAVY VIETNAM VETERANS, ASSOCIATION, INC. v ERIC SHINSEKI
as 1:2013cv01187
Plaintiff:
BLUE WATER NAVY VIETNAM VETERANS ASSOCIATION, INC. and MILITARY-VETERANS ADVOCACY, INC.
Defendant:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
ALLEN v. SHINSEKI
as 1:2012cv01676
Plaintiff:
WARREN H. ALLEN, JR.
Defendant:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLIENT SERVER SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC. v. SHINSEKI et al
as 1:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
CLIENT SERVER SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI and THOMAS J. LENEY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
BRIGADIER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC v. SHINSEKI
as 1:2011cv00497
Plaintiff:
BRIGADIER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
APOLLO v. SHINSEKI
as 1:2011cv01054
Plaintiff:
JOSE G. APOLLO, SR.
Defendant:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2010cv01830
Plaintiff:
ROBEERT R. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and ERIC K. SHINSEKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. SHINSEKI
as 1:2010cv00779
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. SHINSEKI
as 1:2010cv00431
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.