Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Thiele v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Steve Thiele
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Miller v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
George Miller
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Berezin v. Croskrey et al
as 1:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Samuel Berezin
Defendant:
Stephen E. Croskrey, John A. Dowdy, III, Richard Hendrix and others
Nominal Defendant:
Danimer Scientific, Inc.
Coffman v. The Michaels Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00420
Defendant:
The Michaels Companies, Inc., John J. Mahoney, Beryl B. Raff and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Sanchez v. The Michaels Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00410
Plaintiff:
Alex Sanchez
Defendant:
The Michaels Companies, Inc., John J. Mahoney, Beryl B. Raff and others
Griffin v. The Michaels Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00412
Defendant:
The Michaels Companies, Inc., John J. Mahoney, Beryl B. Raff and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Griffin
Poe v. Inphi Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00050
Defendant:
Ford Tamer, William J. Ruehle, David Liddle and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson Poe
In re Application of WG TOPCO S.a.r.l for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 to Conduct Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding
as 1:2018mc00126
Defendant:
Application of WG TOPCO S.a.r.l for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 to Conduct Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding
Respondent:
Ford Motor Company
Petitioner:
WG TOPCO S.a r.l
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Parshall v. Choice Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01669
Defendant:
Mark D. Troudt, Nicolet Bankshares, Inc., Arend A. Stam and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Scarantino v. AmeriGas Partners, L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv01045
Defendant:
AmeriGas Propane Holdings LLC, AmeriGas Partners, L.P., UGI Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Scarantino
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
