Cases 1 - 10 of 170
Medrano Calderon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3468
Petitioner:
FATIMA MEDRANO CALDERON, ANDERSON GONZALEZ and OSCAR GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Arzate Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3383
Petitioner:
FLORINDA ARZATE HERNANDEZ, FATIMA VALERIA JIMENEZ ARZATE and EMMANUEL JIMENEZ ARZATE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alas Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3276
Petitioner:
FATIMA DEL ROSARIO ALAS GOMEZ and AXEL ALESSANDRO MONGE ALAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Warren v. Hilton Grand Vacations, et al.
as 24-2171
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
HILTON GRAND VACATIONS, MARK WANG, JERRY BUTCHER and others
Warren v. Hilton Grand Vacations, et al.
as 24-2098
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
HILTON GRAND VACATIONS, MARK WANG, [61] AC, JERRY BUTCHER, [61] AC and others
Barrett Business Services, Inc. v. Colmenero, et al.
as 24-2032
Plaintiff:
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES COLMENERO, DENELL HOPKINS, SANTIAGO ALEJO and others
ALHABRA et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
LAILA HUSSEIN AHMED ALHABRA, A.F.J.A. and FATIMA FAIZ JON ALKAISI
Defendant:
Secretary ANTONY BLINKEN, EMBASSY OF THE UNITED STATES, KUALA LAMPUR, EMBASSY OF THE UNITED STATES, DJIBOUTI and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv01619
Plaintiff:
Shanoor Fatima Ismail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv01622
Plaintiff:
Shanoor Fatima Ismail, Beneficiary Mohamed Abdul Nadeem Zakee, Beneficiary FNU Umesa Sadia and others
Defendant:
Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, Consul General Mike Hankey and Consul General Jennifer Larson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
