Cases 1 - 10 of 15
NEVILLE v. SUELZER et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Not Yet Classified:
TINA NEVILLE, MG Thomas Suelzer, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Plaintiff:
TINA ANN NEVILLE
Defendant:
THOMAS M. SUELZER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
MOSES v. AIR FORCE et al
as 1:2023cv03239
Plaintiff:
LAUREN ASHLEY MOSES
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, FRANK KENDALL and ALEX WAGNER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
LANTRY v. KENDALL et al
as 1:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
JAMES HENRY LANTRY, III
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
OLSON v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2022cv03123
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D OLSON and RICHARD D. OLSON
Defendant:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HOFFLER v. KENDALL
as 1:2022cv02744
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HOFFLER
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ROBINSON v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2022cv02590
Plaintiff:
BOBBY L ROBINSON, III and BOBBY L. ROBINSON, II
Defendant:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
BAKER v. KENDALL
as 1:2022cv02132
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BAKER
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NADER v. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
as 1:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
WADITH NADER and WADITH S. NADER
Defendant:
Secretary FRANK KENDALL, III and SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv01821
Plaintiff:
Mr. Glenn G. Coleman
Defendant:
Hon. FRANK KENDALL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
COLEMAN v. KENDALL
as 1:2022cv01822
Plaintiff:
THOMAS G. COLEMAN
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
