Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Ellis Staton, et al v. USDC-CAC
as 09-72230
:
In re: ELLIS MICHAEL STATON and SUSAN MARY STATON
Petitioner:
ELLIS MICHAEL STATON and SUSAN MARY STATON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
THE WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY, AKA Garnder Denver Nash, LLC, JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, individually and as successor-Central Environmental Systems, Inc., FKA Borg-Warner Central Environmental Systems, Inc. and others
Marvin Giese v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., et al.
as MN/0:05-CV-02785
Plaintiff:
Marvin Giese
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C
Melvin O. Haugen v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., et al.
as MN/0:05-CV-02786
Plaintiff:
Melvin O. Haugen
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C
Robert J. Morton v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., et al.
as MN/0:05-CV-02789
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Morton
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C
Kurt Gauthier, et al. v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., et al.
as MN/0:05-CV-02784
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C
Plaintiff:
Kurt Gauthier
Darrel Raymond Delage v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., et al.
as MN/0:05-CV-02782
Plaintiff:
Darrel Raymond Delage
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C
Warren Robert Salo v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., et al.
as MN/0:05-CV-02791
Plaintiff:
Warren Robert Salo
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C
Robert John Smith v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., et al.
as MN/0:05-CV-02792
Plaintiff:
Robert John Smith
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C
Anthony Robert Turk v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., et al.
as MN/0:05-CV-02793
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robert Turk
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C
Bonnie Walden v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., et al.
as MN/0:05-CV-02794
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Walden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
