Cases 1 - 10 of 15
v. Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00445
Defendant:
Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd., Sander R. Gerber, Yoav Roth and others
Vick v. Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Shadwrick J. Vick
Defendant:
Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd., Sander R. Gerber, Yoav Roth and others
Gerber v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03294
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gerber
Defendant:
Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Wal-Mart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Matthews v. Gerber Life Insurance Company
as 7:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MATTHEWS
Defendant:
Gerber Life Insurance Company
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
JOHN DOE CORPORATION d/b/a LEGACY QUOTE
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Panarello v. Berbenich et al
as 2:2022cv06565
Plaintiff:
Jeff Panarello
Defendant:
Robert Berbenich and Gerber Ciano Kelly Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ruiz v. AK Steel Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00620
Defendant:
Sheri H. Edison, Ralph S. Michael, III, Dennis C. Cuneo and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Ruiz
Raul v. AK Steel Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00611
Defendant:
Sheri H. Edison, Arlene M. Yocum, Vincente Wright and others
Plaintiff:
David Raul
Spuhler v. AK Steel Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00444
Defendant:
Sheri H. Edison, Arlene M. Yocum, Vincente Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Spuhler
Felton v. Surrogate Court et al
as 1:2015cv04139
Defendant:
Administration for Children Services, Aetna Life Insurance, James Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Felton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
J & J Sports Productions, Inc., v. M. SRG Restaurant Group LLC et al
as 1:2014cv07415
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.,
Defendant:
M. SRG Restaurant Group LLC and Scott Gerber
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
