Cases 1 - 10 of 360
Jenesta Cutter, et al v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 20-6040
Defendant / Appellee:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY, a Division of Ethicon, Inc., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENESTA CUTTER and LARRY A. CUTTER
PATTEN v. ZYCZYNSKI et al
as PAW/2:16-cv-01747
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA PATTEN
Defendant:
HALINA M. ZYCZYNSKI , UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS , WOMEN'S CENTER FOR BLADDER AND PELVIC HEALTH and others
Marcotte v. Ethicon, Inc.
as ILN/1:15-cv-11553
Plaintiff:
Dianna Marcotte
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Gynecare and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Alfermann et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as MOE/4:15-cv-01178
Plaintiff:
Lisa Alfermann and Joseph Alfermann
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology , Gynecare and others
Avis et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as IAN/1:15-cv-00044
Plaintiff:
Judith A Avis and Charles W Avis
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson , Ethicon, Inc and Gynecare
Keeton v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv20442
Plaintiff:
Lana C. Keeton
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. , Gynecare Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Branning v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as MSS/3:14-cv-00993
Plaintiff:
Patricia Branning
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health & Urology and others
WITHERSPOON v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-06931
Plaintiff:
TANYA WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
O'FALLON et al v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-06327
Plaintiff:
CELIA O'FALLON and DENIS O'FALLON
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. , ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. and others
GERBINO et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-06106
Plaintiff:
LAURIE GERBINO and ROBERT GERBINO
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
