Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Federal Trade Commission v. Consumer Defense, LLC et al
as 1:2018mc00024
Receiver:
Edward Chang
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Consumer Defense, LLC, Consumer Link, Inc., Preferred Law, PLLC and others
Ines v. Home Street Bank et al
as 1:2014mc00252
Plaintiff:
Tom Ines
Defendant:
Home Street Bank, Lina Hwang, Ryan Cooney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hagan v. United States National Bank et al
as 1:2014cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey G. Hagan
Defendant:
United States National Bank, U.S. Bancorp, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Guadnola et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
as 1:2012mc00272
Plaintiff:
John-Anthony Guadnola and Lisa-M Garrett-Guadnola
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Nahinu-Respicio et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 1:2011mc00225
Petitioner:
Serverino J. Nahinu-Respicio
Respondent:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Central Pacific Bank, BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dilley et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Chester A.K. Dilley and The Chester Dilley Sr. Revocable Trust dated October 14, 1993
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Countrywide Financial Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
