Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ZHAN v. INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT DEFENDANT
as 1:2022cv03352
Plaintiff:
RENJIE ZHAN
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
John Does 1-7 v. Taliban, et al
as 22-7134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Does 1-7
Defendant / Appellee:
Taliban, Al-Qaeda and Haqqani Network
Garnishee:
International Monetary Fund, Purported Garnishee and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv00617
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
Plaintiff:
SARA GONZALEZ FLAVELL and NO PARTY
Karen Hudes v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, et al
as 11-7109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Karen Hudes
Defendant - Appellee:
Aetna Life Insurance Company, Mark E. Schreiber, John And Jane Does 1-99 and others
HUDES vs. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. et al,
as 1:2010cv01444
Plaintiff:
KAREN HUDES
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. , MARK E. SCHREIBER , JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-99 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
INVERSORA MURTEN v. ENERGOPROJEKT
as 1:2003mc00073
Plaintiff:
INVERSORA MURTEN, S.A.
Defendant:
ENERGOPROJEKT HOLDING COMPANY
Movant:
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION , INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT and WORLD BANK GROUP
Intervenor:
ENERGOPROJEKT-NISKOGRADNJA COMPANY, LTD.
Counter_claimant:
ENERGOPROJEKT-NISKOGRADNJA COMPANY, LTD.
Counter_defendant:
INVERSORA MURTEN, S.A.
Garnishee:
JAPAN FINANCE CORPORATION and JAPAN BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Intl Bnk Reconst v. DC Govt
as 98-7055
Plaintiff - Appellee:
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia Government, Office of the Mayor
:
United States of America, , and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
