Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Adams County, PA, et alIn re: Adams County, PA, et al
as 22-3653
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
Petitioner:
ADAMS COUNTY, PA, LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP, PA, ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA and others
Salih, et al v. Plaintiff's Liaison Counsel, et al
as 21-3460
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAIN PHARMACY DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFFS' LIAISON COUNSEL, MANUFACTURING DEFENDANTS and others
Intervenor:
MARK BROWN, SALIH, fka Cecil La'Roy Hall, WALTONA WINCHESTER and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
In re: State of OH Board of Pharmacy
as 20-3375
Respondent:
CVS RX SERVICES, INC., CVS INDIANA, LLC, RITE AID OF MARYLAND, INC., dba Rite Aid Mid-Atlantic Customer Support Center and others
Petitioner:
STATE OF OHIO BOARD OF PHARMACY
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp, et alIn re: AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp, et al
as 19-3935
Petitioner:
WEST VIRGINIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION, CVS RX SERVICES, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
In re: State of Ohio
as 19-3827
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, STATE OF HAWAII and others
Petitioner:
STATE OF OHIO
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp., et al
as 19-3682
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
Petitioner:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION
In re: Nat'l Prescrip Opiate Lit
as 19-3398
Defendant / Appellee:
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., nka Actavis, Inc., ALLERGAN, PLC, fka Actavis, PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMANDA HANLON and AMY GARDNER
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
