Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jorge Rico v. James Robertson, et al
as 21-16880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORGE ANDRADE RICO
Defendant / Appellee:
F. P. MARULLI, Lieutentant at P.B.S.P., D. ABERNATHY, Sergeant at P.B.S.P., C. PARRY, P.B.S.P. Official and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL STAINER, SCOTT KERNAN, KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden and others
Zane Hubbard v. M. Stainer, et al
as 19-16880
Defendant / Appellee:
R. GOODWIN, M. D. STAINER, SCOTT KERNAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZANE HUBBARD, AKA Zane Molina Hubbard
Zane Hubbard v. M. Stainer, et al
as 19-16271
Defendant / Appellee:
R. GOODWIN, M. D. STAINER, SCOTT KERNAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZANE HUBBARD
Jose Magana-Torres v. Kelly Harrington
as 19-15551
Respondent / Appellee:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE HUMBERTO MAGANA-TORRES
Derrick Oden, Sr. v. J. Acebedo, et al
as 19-55180
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ACEBEDO, L. PARKER, (CSPR), Official and Individual Capacity, R. KNOWLES, Captain, Official and Individual Capacity and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and ANTHONY GROUNDS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK JESUS ODEN, Sr.
Howard Raff v. USDC-CAOAK
as 18-70009
:
In re: HOWARD E. RAFF
Petitioner:
HOWARD E. RAFF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden
Steven Magallon v. USDC-NVL
as 13-70142
:
In re: STEVEN RUBEN MAGALLON
Petitioner:
STEVEN RUBEN MAGALLON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden
Carl Jones v. Kelly Harrington
as 12-71849
Petitioner:
CARL LAMONT JONES
Respondent:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden
Alexander Valentine v. Kelly Harrington
as 11-70596
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER VALENTINE
Respondent:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, Warden
Clarance Williams v. Kelly Harrington
as 11-70197
Petitioner:
CLARANCE LE-ROND WILLIAMS
Respondent:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
