Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Segura v. Tschetter Sulzer, P.C.
as 1:2024cv01617
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Segura
Defendant:
Tschetter Sulzer, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hudson v. HomeAdvisor, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hudson
Defendant:
HomeAdvisor, Inc. doing business as Angi
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lachut v. Carbonite, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03488
Defendant:
Linda Connly, Carbonite, Inc., Todd Krasnow and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Lachut
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Thrasher et al v. Rocky Mountain Auto Brokers, Inc.
as 1:2018cv02342
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cyr and Mickey Thrasher
Defendant:
Rocky Mountain Auto Brokers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Dish Network LLC v. Finfrock et al
as 1:2018cv01689
Respondent:
Michael Finfrock, Ali Saleh, Mauricio Gamez and others
Petitioner:
Dish Network L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Zeppelin et al v. Federal Highway Administration
as 1:2017cv01661
Plaintiff:
Kyle Zeppelin , Brad Evans , Christine O'Connor and others
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Zand v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01570
Plaintiff:
Stuart Zand
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc. , Howell M. Estes, III , Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Gussin v. DigitalGlobe, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01190
Plaintiff:
Dane Gussin
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc , Howell M. Estes, Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bussey v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01159
Plaintiff:
Royce Bussey
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc., Howell M. Estes, III, Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
Dish Network L.L.C. v. Finfrock et al
as 1:2017cv01155
Plaintiff:
Dish Network L.L.C.
Defendant:
Michael Finfrock , Mauricio Gamez , Ronda Harlan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
