Cases 1 - 10 of 15,432
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HYBRID PHARMA LLC v. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 0:2024cv61043
Plaintiff:
HYBRID PHARMA LLC
Defendant:
Food and Drug Administration and Robert Califf
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brown v. Premium Capital Fund LLC
as 8:2024cv01469
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Brown
Defendant:
Premium Capital Fund LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Allen v. FSST Management Services, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
Sean Allen
Defendant:
FSST Management Services LLC d/b/a 605 Lending, Lead Bank, Dustin A. Dernier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FARSIAN v. ALPHALETE ATHLETICS LLC
as 0:2024cv61027
Plaintiff:
KOUROSH FARSIAN
Defendant:
ALPHALETE ATHLETICS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
