Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Parker v. Manzano, et al.
as 24-1723
Plaintiff:
DEREK RICHARD PARKER
Defendant:
MIMI MANZANO, United States Probation Officer, YMELDA VALENZUELA, United States Probation Supervisory Officer, CHRISTOPHER J. MARCO, United States Probation Supervisory Officer and others
Manzano v. Capitol One
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Donald Addison Manzano
Defendant:
Capitol One
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cruz-Manzano v. Garland
as 24-1031
Petitioner:
CARLOS CRUZ-MANZANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Parker v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, San Diego
as 24-321
Petitioner:
DEREK RICHARD PARKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Not Classified By Court:
MIMI MANZANO, United States Probation Officer, YMELDA VALENZUELA, United States Probation Supervisory Officer and CHRISTOPHER J. MARCO, United States Probation Supervisory Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Alfaro Manzano v. Garland
as 22-1521
Petitioner:
GERSON EDUARDO ALFARO MANZANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
