Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jeffrey Ziegler, et al v. Correctional Industries, et al
as 21-35998
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SCOTT ZIEGLER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN HEGGE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES, SUSAN KORTOKRAX, DON MILLER and others
Jeffrey Ziegler, et al v. Correctional Industries, et al
as 21-35525
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN KORTOKRAX, WILLIAM LANE, FKA Lane, JACK S. ENG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT ZIEGLER and ALVIN HEGGE
Ronald Sorenson v. Margaret Gilbert, et al
as 20-35486
Respondent:
RICHARD L. MORGAN
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD SORENSON
Respondent / Appellee:
MARGARET GILBERT
Erin Rieman v. Margaret Gilbert
as 20-35463
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIN DEAN RIEMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
MARGARET GILBERT
Quinton Brown v. Margaret Gilbert, et al
as 20-35376
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY WAKEMAN, Chaplain, Stafford Creek Correction Cener, BELINDA STEWART, Religious Program Manager, DOC Headquarters, MARGARET GILBERT, Supt, Stafford Creek Correction Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTON P. BROWN
DeAngelo Green v. Margaret Gilbert, et al
as 19-35760
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD W. ESTES, CC2, Correctional Officer at SCCC, CLEARANCE KILWEIN, CC2, Correctional Officer at SCCC, MIKE GLEASON, Chief I and I, SCCC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEANGELO A. GREEN
Defendant:
JANE DOE, 1-4 and JOHN DOE, 1-10
Samuel Piatnitsky v. Belinda Stewart, et al
as 19-35478
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY WAKEMAN, DENNIS DAHNE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL M. PIATNITSKY
Jacob Squibb v. Margaret Gilbert
as 17-73164
Petitioner:
JACOB ALLEN SQUIBB
Respondent:
MARGARET GILBERT, Superintendent
Donald Lee v. Margaret Gilbert
as 17-72541
Petitioner:
DONALD MORRIS LEE
Respondent:
MARGARET GILBERT
Robert Thiery, Jr. v. Margaret Gilbert
as 17-70788
Petitioner:
ROBERT JOHN THIERY, Jr.
Respondent:
MARGARET GILBERT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
