Cases 1 - 10 of 125
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Watson Realty Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J. Arko and Andrew M. Moore
Defendant:
Watson Realty Corp., Premiere Plus Realty Co., Charles Rutenberg Realty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moore v. Space Coast Credit Union
as 0:2023cv60659
Plaintiff:
Renate Moore
Defendant:
Space Coast Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moore Jr. v. Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation
as 9:2022cv80854
Plaintiff:
Columbus J. Moore Jr.
Defendant:
Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
E-Telequote Insurance, Inc. v. Mayberry et al
as 8:2022cv01222
Plaintiff:
E-Telequote Insurance, Inc.
Defendant:
Aubrey Mayberry, Alisa Cravey, Rich Budwell and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jeffrey Carter Andersen
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv62235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
